सुनील बत्रा बनाम दिल्ली प्रशासन
| Citation | AIR 1978 SC 1675, (1978) 4 SCC 494 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) |
| Date | 30 August 1978 |
| Year | 1978 |
| Bench | Y.V. Chandrachud CJ, V.R. Krishna Iyer, S.M. Fazl Ali, P.N. Shinghal, D.A. Desai JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Article 14, Article 19, Article 21 |
| Category | Constitutional Law, Criminal Law |
Key Principle Established
Prisoners retain their fundamental rights behind bars. Prison walls do not keep out fundamental rights. Solitary confinement and bar fetters violate Article 21.
Sunil Batra, a death row prisoner in Tihar Jail, wrote a letter to Justice Krishna Iyer complaining about a fellow prisoner being tortured by a jail warder. The letter was treated as a habeas corpus petition.
Justice Krishna Iyer delivered the landmark holding on prisoners’ rights:
Sunil Batra is the foundational judgment on prisoners’ rights in India. It created the entire framework of prison jurisprudence — the right to dignity, protection from torture, judicial oversight of prisons, and epistolary jurisdiction. Every subsequent prisoners’ rights case cites Sunil Batra.
(1982) 1 SCC 618
Equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal derivable from Articles 14, 16, and 39(d) read together.
Read Analysis(2020) 9 SCC 1
Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…
Read Analysis(1984) 1 SCC 131
An institution receiving government grants is "State" under Article 12. Employees of such bodies are entitled to Article 14 and…
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.