INDIA
CitationAIR 1983 SC 361
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date16 February 1983
Year1983
BenchO. Chinnappa Reddy, R.B. Misra JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 21, Article 32
CategoryConstitutional Law, Criminal Law

Key Principle Established

Delay exceeding two years in execution of death sentence entitles the prisoner to invoke Article 21 for commutation to life imprisonment.

Brief Facts

A death row prisoner had been condemned over 8 years ago and kept in solitary confinement. He argued that it was no longer lawful to execute him due to the prolonged delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that delay exceeding two years in execution of death sentence is sufficient to invoke Article 21 for commutation to life imprisonment. Prolonged delay on death row, with its psychological agony, constitutes cruel and inhuman punishment.

Impact & Significance

Though the rigid two-year rule was later modified by the Constitution Bench in Sher Singh v. State of Punjab (1983) and Triveniben (1988), the principle that unreasonable delay is a ground for commutation remains established law, as reaffirmed in Shatrughan Chauhan (2014).

Tags & Related Topics

Constitutional Law Criminal Law Article 21 Article 32
← Previous Judgment Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Next Judgment → Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Related Judgments

1982

Randhir Singh v. Union of India

(1982) 1 SCC 618

Equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal derivable from Articles 14, 16, and 39(d) read together.

Read Analysis
2020

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma

(2020) 9 SCC 1

Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…

Read Analysis
1984

B.S. Minhas v. Indian Statistical Institute

(1984) 1 SCC 131

An institution receiving government grants is "State" under Article 12. Employees of such bodies are entitled to Article 14 and…

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266