INDIA
Citation(2013) 1 SCC 598
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date30 November 2012
Year2013
BenchK.S. Radhakrishnan, Dipak Misra JJ.
Acts/ArticlesIPC Sections 294, 509, Article 21
CategoryConstitutional Law, Criminal Law, Women's Rights

Key Principle Established

Directions issued to combat eve-teasing nationwide — deployment of plain-clothed female police, CCTV installation, complaint committees in all institutions.

Brief Facts

The case arose from incidents of eve-teasing and sexual harassment in public places. The Supreme Court took cognizance of the widespread problem affecting women and girl students in buses, trains, educational institutions, and workplaces.

Directions Issued

  • All State Governments must depute plain-clothed female police officers at bus stands, railway stations, malls, parks, places of worship
  • CCTV cameras to be installed at strategic positions in public places
  • All educational institutions and workplaces must constitute complaint committees
  • Stringent action to be taken against eve-teasers under IPC Sections 294 and 509

Impact & Significance

This judgment led to nationwide anti-eve-teasing measures and strengthened the safety infrastructure for women in public spaces. It was a precursor to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 which introduced stricter penalties for sexual offences.

Tags & Related Topics

Constitutional Law Criminal Law Women's Rights IPC Sections 294 509 Article 21
← Previous Judgment D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
Next Judgment → Epuru Sudhakar v. Government of A.P.

Related Judgments

1982

Randhir Singh v. Union of India

(1982) 1 SCC 618

Equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal derivable from Articles 14, 16, and 39(d) read together.

Read Analysis
2020

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma

(2020) 9 SCC 1

Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…

Read Analysis
1984

B.S. Minhas v. Indian Statistical Institute

(1984) 1 SCC 131

An institution receiving government grants is "State" under Article 12. Employees of such bodies are entitled to Article 14 and…

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266