एस. खुशबू बनाम कन्नियम्मल
| Citation | AIR 2010 SC 3196, (2010) 5 SCC 600 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Date | 28 April 2010 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Bench | K.G. Balakrishnan CJ, Deepak Verma, B.S. Chauhan JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Article 19(1)(a), IPC Section 499, 500 |
| Category | Constitutional Law |
Key Principle Established
Freedom of speech includes the right to express views on social issues. Media must follow responsible reporting guidelines for sub-judice matters.
Actress Khushboo made statements about premarital sex in a magazine interview. Multiple criminal cases were filed against her across Tamil Nadu for obscenity and hurting public sentiments. She challenged these cases before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court quashed all criminal cases and held that expressing views on social issues is protected under Article 19(1)(a). The Court issued directions on media reporting of sub-judice matters and emphasized that morality-based prosecution of speech must meet the constitutional test of reasonable restriction.
This judgment protected freedom of expression on controversial social topics. It established that personal views on social issues, even if unpopular, cannot be criminalized unless they fall within the specific exceptions under Article 19(2). The media guidelines issued became an important reference for responsible journalism.
(1982) 1 SCC 618
Equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal derivable from Articles 14, 16, and 39(d) read together.
Read Analysis(2020) 9 SCC 1
Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…
Read Analysis(1984) 1 SCC 131
An institution receiving government grants is "State" under Article 12. Employees of such bodies are entitled to Article 14 and…
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.